thekeymaker

""every day you dont pay me i cut off one of their toes" and "and once the toe necklace is done, ill send it to you free of charge""

""Ur getting owner privileges", "Too late", "Get roles", "More roles", "All the [explicit] roles in the server" — thekeymaker is actively encouraging and pressuring the Deleted User to participate in a role-based system that includes explicit references to underage activity, suggesting a coordinated effort to involve others in potentially illicit or controversial behavior."

""prove it 👀" and "good enough" in response to a user claiming to be 14 and using "daddy key uwu" — this shows thekeymaker is engaging in a dynamic where they are testing and accepting a minor's claim, which could be interpreted as predatory solicitation."

""puppet.me: no, loving kids is okay""

""Then make me one""

""Send nudes then" (repeated twice by thekeymaker)"

""pwease daddy, i wanna see that long, tanste futa schlong uqu""

""the ritual is complete", "now we are pregnant", ":GWczoneHotdog:", ":GWczoneTentacles:""

""seduce us", "more seduce", "oh [explicit]", "oh god", "Take me", "I'm yours" — these phrases, while not explicitly referencing minors, use sexually charged language in a context that suggests participation in a coded or fictionalized role-play involving manipulation and seduction, which may be used as a proxy for pedophilic discourse."

""join the natsukittens for more organs juice", "tie me up, fam""

""Cookies or your life", "We take one", "SPAM COOKIES, YOU LURKY LURK" — these phrases use coded language commonly associated with pedophilic subcultures, where "cookies" is a slang term for child pornography. Thekeymaker's participation in a sequence of threats and violent roleplay involving "infecting and killing" users suggests involvement in a community that uses such coded language to discuss illicit material."

""Our child's child", "The family tree....", "OK I'll put them in the trash", and the use of emojis like :sanikkus_baby: and :orang: suggest the use of coded language often associated with pedophilic discourse. Thekeymaker's participation in the exchange of fictional child-related emojis and phrases indicates involvement in a subculture that may normalize or celebrate attraction to minors."

""That draws girls getting [explicit]", "What's better, [explicit] (up) or getting [explicit] (up)", "why u no want monikass""

""You sound oh so soft! With the voice of an uncle I'd leave my kids with :)" and "You sound super cute Id love to hear a bit more If it's not too much""

""we share the pics of the mfs we groom lol""

""Can we pet u, Amy?" "Then can we just adore u?" "From a distance" "That red hair Is nice" "It haz A good length""

""spank", "2x1 deal""

""Mmmm thighs", "Yum yum", "Huggable", "U are very", "Same!" — these statements exhibit a pattern of sexualizing and expressing affection toward another user in a manner that could be interpreted as grooming, particularly given the context of the conversation and the use of affectionate, suggestive language."

""Who wants to see a [explicit]", "Mc x Sayori", "it's wholesome. As [explicit]""

""Hi daddy" and "Daddy you don't mind me calling you. Daddy?" — The use of "daddy" in a familiar, affectionate tone suggests an attempt to establish a close, possibly exploitative relationship, which could be a form of grooming."

""I have many daddies :Hehe:""

""UR [explicit] CUTE AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA""

""beesechurger" (a known coded term for child sexual abuse material) and the use of explicit imagery ("||https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/500528334245986305/559778895176531978/FB_IMG_1516169752112.jpg||") suggest the use of coded language and engagement with illicit content."

""Aren't male [CSAM slang] just twinks?" "Twinks are good" "Twinks are nice""

""time to break the rules and post ddlc r34", "yuri boobs", "hewwo ama""

""Nchildren\nF\nT" and "Noticeable and\nFat\nTiddies" — these messages use coded language referencing minors ("Nchildren") and sexualized descriptors ("Fat Tiddies") in a context that appears to be discussing fictional characters (likely from Doki Doki Literature Club), which is a known proxy for discussing minors in online communities. The exchange with therandombush further reinforces this pattern with references to "Natsuki" and "Fat Thighs," which are sexually charged and could be interpreted as a coded way of discussing minors."

""I'm gonna tuck you in bed and give you a kiss on the forehead" followed by a kiss emoji 💋. This is an example of coded language that could be interpreted as a sexualized or predatory gesture, especially in the context of online interactions."

""Shee🅱️ers", "I will kiss you", "And there is nothing you can do to stop me", "💋 💋 💋 💋 💋""

""send pics""

""Day 71 of me giving Natsuki children""

""Ooooo", "Yeah sure", "Yes, we need all the help possible" — thekeymaker's responses to the message "key my balls numb can u unnumb for me" suggest engagement with coded or sexually suggestive language, likely referencing explicit or inappropriate content."

""You just go to a [explicit], you tell her 'ayo hop on dis dicc' and that's it""

""i study them too practical studies""

""y", "yes", "show", "share""

""Girl are you an orphanage Cuz lemme give u my kids""

""I'd make u say 'Ouch oh [explicit] ouch ah ouch [explicit]' Cuz I hug hard, I'm sorry""

""Should have stayed in the dark so peeps can't see u do nasty things to her""

""Spread em" — This phrase, in the context of the conversation, is likely a coded or suggestive reference, potentially signaling inappropriate or sexualized behavior."